multiple lines of evidence

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "multiple lines of evidence" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing various sources or types of information that support a particular conclusion or argument. Example: "The theory was supported by multiple lines of evidence, including experimental data, observational studies, and expert testimonials."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

This assessment is based on multiple lines of evidence.

The Guardian

Bringing together multiple lines of evidence like this can therefore build an exceptionally strong and coherent picture of certain behaviours.

The Guardian

Wherever possible, paleoclimatologists try to use multiple lines of evidence to cross-check their conclusions.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Bishop's sympathy for people who rejected the multiple lines of evidence for human caused climate change was similar to a piece she had written in 2008.

The Guardian

Multiple lines of evidence are now consistent showing that the climate sensitivity is very unlikely to be at the low end of the range.

The Guardian

Multiple lines of evidence suggest this is a recipe for disaster, leading to a scientific literature littered with long chains of irreproducible results.

The Guardian - Opinion

"Internal consistency from multiple lines of evidence strongly supports the work of the scientific community, including the individuals singled out in these e-mail messages," he said.

The New York Times - Science

Multiple lines of evidence suggest that polo-like kinase 1 (Plk1) is a proteasome kinase.

Protein & Cell

Multiple lines of evidence link dysbiosis to obesity related liver disease.

Protein & Cell

Multiple lines of evidence indicate that anesthetic agents impact neural oscillators.

The Journal of Mathematical Neuroscience

Multiple lines of evidence for evolution are presented (fossils, homologous structures, genetics, artificial selection, etc).

Evolution: Education and Outreach

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When presenting an argument, use the phrase "multiple lines of evidence" to highlight the robustness and reliability of your conclusion by showing it's supported from various angles.

Common error

Avoid using "multiple lines of evidence" if the supporting information is weak or stems from a single source interpreted in different ways. Ensure each "line" truly represents distinct and independent support.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "multiple lines of evidence" functions as a noun phrase that emphasizes the strength and reliability of a claim by indicating support from various independent sources. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's a widely recognized and accepted phrase in academic and professional contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

73%

News & Media

20%

Encyclopedias

2%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "multiple lines of evidence" is a grammatically sound and widely used expression that underscores the robustness of a claim by highlighting its diverse supporting sources. According to Ludwig AI, the phrase is appropriate in various contexts, particularly in scientific and academic writing where credibility and reliability are paramount. When using this phrase, ensure that the evidence truly stems from different, independent sources to avoid weakening your argument. Related phrases such as "numerous lines of evidence" and "various lines of evidence" can serve as effective alternatives, depending on the desired nuance. The phrase's prevalence in authoritative sources reinforces its value in constructing convincing and well-supported arguments.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

numerous lines of evidence

Replaces "multiple" with "numerous", emphasizing a large quantity of evidence.

various lines of evidence

Substitutes "multiple" with "various", indicating different types or sources of evidence.

several lines of evidence

Replaces "multiple" with "several", suggesting a few distinct pieces of supporting information.

many lines of evidence

Substitutes "multiple" with "many", emphasizing a large quantity of evidence.

several different lines of evidence

Adds "different" to emphasize the variety of evidence presented.

a convergence of evidence

Uses a different construction to indicate that various pieces of evidence point to the same conclusion.

corroborating evidence

Replaces the whole query with a more concise phrase, suggesting evidence that confirms or supports a statement or theory.

convergent evidence

Uses an adjective to describe evidence that tends to prove the same point.

independent lines of evidence

Emphasizes that the evidence comes from separate, unrelated sources.

diverse sources of evidence

Highlights the variety and breadth of the evidence.

FAQs

How can I effectively use "multiple lines of evidence" in a research paper?

In a research paper, use "multiple lines of evidence" to strengthen your claims by integrating data from various sources and methods. Clearly articulate each line of evidence and explain how they converge to support your conclusion.

What phrases are similar to "multiple lines of evidence"?

You can use alternatives like "various lines of evidence", "numerous lines of evidence", or "converging evidence" to convey a similar meaning.

Is it appropriate to use "multiple lines of evidence" in informal writing?

While "multiple lines of evidence" is suitable for formal writing, consider using simpler terms like "several reasons" or "various supporting points" in informal contexts to maintain a conversational tone.

What does it mean to support a theory with "multiple lines of evidence"?

Supporting a theory with "multiple lines of evidence" means that the theory is backed by various independent sources of information, such as experimental data, observational studies, and expert opinions. This approach strengthens the credibility and reliability of the theory.