Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(11)
Adjusted changes in mean SF-36 mental component summary scores calculated using multiple imputation reported at each follow-up interval, by participant group.
Adjusted mean SF-36 mental component summary scores calculated using multiple imputation, reported at each follow-up visit by participant group.
Adjusted mean SF-36 physical component summary scores calculated using multiple imputation, reported at each follow-up visit by participant group.
Adjusted changes in mean SF-36 physical component summary scores calculated using multiple imputation reported at each follow-up interval, by participant group.
Adjusted changes in mean SF-36 mental component summary scores calculated using multiple imputation reported since the baseline visit to each follow-up interval, by each participant group.
Adjusted changes in mean SF-36 physical component summary scores calculated using multiple imputation reported since the baseline visit to each follow-up interval, by each participant group.
Similar(49)
Multiple imputation was reported in just one article.
Results obtained after imputation were similar to those found when analysing the complete records only; therefore results obtained from multiple imputation are reported.
Means, SDs and within-group effect sizes, including CIs, for all assessment points with missing values replaced by multiple imputation are reported in table 3. Paired t tests showed significant changes on all measures from pretreatment to post-treatment (t(df=13.72 20.15)=3.10–7.54, all p values <0.01), and from pretreatment to follow-up (t(df=10.96 19.24 =3.13 8.66, all p values <0.01).
Given the approach taken in prior MESA analyses (which have not used multiple imputation), we report results based on participants with complete data.
20 21 In recent years, efforts have been made to address missing data in primary care databases 3 19 22 using multiple imputation, though reporting on the comparability of the results of multiple imputation with population data has been sparse.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com