multiple conclusions

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "multiple conclusions" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing various outcomes or results derived from a particular analysis, argument, or situation. Example: "After reviewing the data, the researchers arrived at multiple conclusions regarding the effectiveness of the treatment."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

10 human-written examples

Other cases are less clear but show the multiple conclusions cases of retrograde amnesia tend to offer.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

Despite multiple conclusions by the US Justice Department that police forces systematically use force against the mentally ill, there remains no national standard for crisis intervention.

The Guardian

Multiple studies of blood flow present multiple conclusions.

Nutritional Cosmetics Beauty from Within

In Gentzen's proof theory for classical logic, a notion of consequence is defined to hold between multiple premises and multiple conclusions.

SEP

One could try to develop an appropriate intuition by arguing that reasoning towards multiple conclusions delineates the area in which truth lies rather than establishing a single proposition as true.

SEP

While in Kraus et al. (1990) the standard of deduction was classical propositional logic, in Arieli and Avron (2000) also nonclassical monotonic core logics and variants with multiple conclusions are considered.

SEP

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

50 human-written examples

(However, see Restall (2005) for a defence of multiple conclusion consequence for Anti-realists; and see Beall (2011) for a defence of certain sub-classical multiple-conclusion logics in the service of non-classical solutions to paradox).

SEP

In particular, those anti-Realists who take logical consequence to be defined in terms of proof (such as Michael Dummett) reject a multiple conclusion analysis of logical consequence.

SEP

For an Anti-realist, who takes good inference to be characterised by the way warrant is transmitted from premise to conclusion, it seems that a multiple conclusion analysis of logical consequence is out of the question.

SEP

In a multiple conclusion argument from A to B, C, any warrant we have for A does not necessarily transmit to B or C: the only conclusion we are warranted to draw is the disjunction B or C, so it seems for an analysis of consequence in terms of warrant we need to understand some logical vocabulary (in this case, disjunction) in order to understand the consequence relation.

SEP

Truth is preserved in a valid inference from the premises to the conclusion (or the conclusions in a multiple-conclusion setting).

SEP

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "multiple conclusions", ensure that each conclusion is clearly and distinctly articulated to avoid ambiguity. Providing supporting evidence for each conclusion strengthens your argument.

Common error

Avoid presenting trivial or unsubstantiated points as significant "multiple conclusions". Ensure each conclusion carries substantial weight and is well-supported by evidence.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "multiple conclusions" functions as a noun phrase, typically serving as the object of a verb or preposition. It identifies that an analysis or investigation has led to more than one conclusive finding. As Ludwig AI confirms, the expression is perfectly usable in written English.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

78%

News & Media

20%

Formal & Business

2%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "multiple conclusions" is a grammatically correct and commonly used expression, particularly in scientific and academic writing. It indicates that an analysis or study has resulted in several distinct outcomes. While Ludwig AI confirms its usability, effective writing involves clearly articulating each conclusion with supporting evidence. Alternatives such as "various conclusions" or "several conclusions" can be used depending on the desired emphasis. It's important to ensure that each conclusion is well-supported and significant, avoiding the presentation of trivial points as major findings.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

various conclusions

Replaces "multiple" with "various", indicating a number of different conclusions.

several conclusions

Substitutes "multiple" with "several", suggesting more than two conclusions.

numerous conclusions

Replaces "multiple" with "numerous", emphasizing a large number of conclusions.

manifold conclusions

Uses "manifold" to replace "multiple", indicating that the conclusions are varied and diverse.

diverse conclusions

Focuses on the variety of the conclusions rather than the quantity.

conflicting conclusions

Highlights that the conclusions are not in agreement with each other.

differing conclusions

Emphasizes that the conclusions are not the same.

varying conclusions

Indicates that the conclusions change or differ.

multiple interpretations

Shifts focus to interpretations instead of conclusions, implying there are several ways to understand something.

several interpretations

Replaces "multiple" with "several" and shifts focus to interpretations.

FAQs

How can I effectively present "multiple conclusions" in my writing?

Clearly list each conclusion, provide supporting evidence for each, and explain how they relate to the main argument. Use transition words like "furthermore", "moreover", and "in addition" to connect them.

What are some alternatives to using the phrase "multiple conclusions"?

You can use alternatives like "various conclusions", "several conclusions", or "numerous conclusions" depending on the context.

Is it better to have "multiple conclusions" or a single, strong conclusion?

It depends on the subject and evidence. "Multiple conclusions" are suitable when the evidence supports various distinct outcomes, whereas a single, strong conclusion is better when the evidence converges to one central point.

What's the difference between "multiple conclusions" and "multiple interpretations"?

"Multiple conclusions" usually refer to different outcomes or results from a study or analysis, while "multiple interpretations" refer to different ways of understanding the same set of facts or data.