Sentence examples for multiple comparisons showed from inspiring English sources

However, a post hoc Bonferroni adjustment for multiple comparisons showed that the Gemini-FRPC group showed no statistical significance.

Multiple comparisons showed that LF% was significantly lower in homozygous Arg16 carriers compared to subjects with the Arg16/Gly16 genotype (p = 0.016), but not to homozygous Gly16 carriers (p = 0.985).

Multiple comparisons showed statistical differences between 0 h and 6 h after scenting the solution with LIO (p<0.0001; Fig. 3B) and between 0 h and 24 h (p<0.0001, Fig. 3B), but not between 6 h and 24 h (p>0.05, Fig. 3B).

In addition, for biting and formic acid projection, multiple comparisons showed that, compared to a nestmate (homocolonial test) and both of the two control tests, the duration of these behaviors was significantly greater toward an ant belonging to a different species (heterospecific test) (Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney U test using Bonferroni's sequential adjustment method, α = 0.05).

The Newman-Keuls post-hoc test for multiple comparisons showed that whereas no difference in the amount of altruistic lies between the R block and the NR block was found, subjects produced more self-gain lies in the NR block respect to the R block (Figure 1).

Post-hoc multiple comparisons showed that the expression of biomarker MY15B was significantly lower in SPMS than HC.

p-values were adjusted with false discovery rate correction [53] to correct for multiple comparisons (shown in Table 1).

A subsequent sequential paired t-test on each SNR (with Holms' correction for multiple comparisons) shows that there is an enhancement at high (less negative) SNR (for −8 dB or higher) and no significant enhancement below −12 dB.

The result of the Bonferroni multiple comparison showed that the plant biomass at the 0.6- and 1.2-km sites was significantly smaller than that at the 2.4- and 3.0-km sites (P < 0.05).

The result of the Bonferroni multiple comparison showed that the coverage of nariin ovs at the 0.6-, 1.2-, and 1.8-km sites was significantly greater than the coverage at the 2.4- and 3.0-km sites (P < 0.05).

The Student-Newman-Keuls multiple comparison showed that the no-wait situation yielded a lower excitement score than did the situations with no filler, unrelated filler, and related filler, supporting Hypothesis 2 1.