Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(9)
After Bonferroni correction in multiple comparisons, none of the clinical features showed a significant association (Pcorrected>0.05) with overall patient outcome.
After appropriate adjustment for confounding variables and Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons, none of the tagging SNPs was reliably associated with measures of adiposity.
After corrections for multiple comparisons, none of these remained significant.
After correction for multiple comparisons, none of the CHARGE SNPs were associated with vascular calcification (p < 0.0014).
However, after Bonferroni adjustment for multiple comparisons, none of the miRNAs remained significant predictors of APACHE-II.
After correcting for multiple comparisons, none of the Tajima's D estimates were significantly different from zero (Table 4).
Similar(50)
After controlling for multiple comparisons testing, none of the associations with specific allergic/atopic or autoimmune conditions remained significant.
However, since multiple comparisons were made, none of these correlations were significant after making a Bonferroni correction, so these correlations are at most possibly significant.
A secondary analysis comparing ESKD diabetic patients to controls yielded no significant correlations: no P-value for any of the 42 SNPs was <0.01 before multiple comparisons correction and none of these could be considered significant under FDR or any other reasonable multiple comparison correction (Supplementary Material, Table S4.6).
After correcting for multiple comparisons, 0.05/21 = 0.002, none of differences are statistically significant.
However, after multiple comparisons were corrected for, none of these associations was statistically significant.
More suggestions(15)
multiple providers none
multiple sites none
multiple bills none
multiple endings none
multiple areas none
multiple experiments none
multiple interviews none
multiple territories none
multiple tests none
multiple owners none
multiple factors none
multiple narrators none
multiple bioactivities none
multiple publications none
multiple mechanisms none
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com