Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(15)
After controlling for multiple comparisons no significant difference appeared between European males and females.
When the results were corrected for multiple comparisons, no differences in activations between children with DD and typically achieving children were found on this task.
After correction for multiple comparisons, no correlations were significant.
After correcting for multiple comparisons, no SNPs appeared to be associated with OA.
After correction for multiple comparisons, no significant associations between common genetic variants and TOF susceptibility were found.
Lowering the criterion for significance, even at P < 0.01 uncorrected for multiple comparisons, no regions in basal ganglia correlated significantly with symbolic distance.
Similar(45)
Therefore, there were no multiple comparisons, so no adjustments to the significance level alpha were required.
Pairwise comparisons of correct responses using Student's t-test (corrected for multiple comparisons) revealed no significant differences between the conditions.
However, it should be noted that in the PD group, at a low threshold of 0.001 uncorrected for multiple comparisons, and no correction for cluster size, a symmetrical cluster of age-related atrophy was observed in the middle corpus callosum.
After Bonferroni adjustment for multiple comparisons, however, no statistically significant association of the fibrinogen levels with the Leu217 allele was detected (Bonferroni's adjustment requires a significance level of p≤0.00156).
Multiple comparisons revealed no further significant differences in Xhariep.
More suggestions(15)
multiple locations no
multiple correlations no
multiple subjects no
multiple tests no
multiple servers no
multiple jobs no
multiple admissions no
multiple choices no
multiple processors no
multiple studies no
multiple repetitions no
multiple nominations no
multiple clients no
multiple surgeries no
multiple stakeholders no
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com