Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(2)
In their review of 15 studies examining the effects of atypical antipsychotic medication on the cognitive abilities of patients with SC, Keefe et al (1999), after correcting for multiple comparisons, determined that nine of the 15 studies found significant cognitive improvement for at least one test measure.
A single voxel threshold of the map resulting from the F-test was set at a P < 0.05, and a minimum cluster size of 2079 mm was used to correct for multiple comparisons, determined by Monte Carlo simulation.
Similar(58)
Statistical significance of multiple comparisons was determined by ANOVA and difference between two groups was determined by two-tailed Student's t test.
Multiple comparisons were determined by Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) followed by the Post-hoc LSD test.
Multiple comparisons were determined using one-way analysis of variance followed by a post hoc test (Tukey's multiple comparison test).
Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons were determined by dividing the criterion P < 0.05 by the total number of the study groups (P < 0.05/4 = P < 0.0125).
All data were expressed as means±S.E.M. Statistical significance for multiple comparisons was determined by one-way ANOVA plus a Tukey post hoc test.
Statistical significance for paired samples and for multiple comparisons was determined by Student's t-test and by one-way analysis of variance with Tukey's test, respectively.
Empirical p values for the F statistic for the genotypic effect, corrected for multiple comparisons, were determined by 2,000 random permutations of the genotypic data [ 24].
One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was applied to test the significance of difference between average biochemical and ECG parameters of different groups and multiple comparisons were determined by post hocDunnett's test.
The Scheffe multiple comparisons test determined the existence of statistically significant differences in regard to the HIA (p = .002) recorded between the two age ranges 21 30 and 41 50 (Table 5).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com