Sentence examples for multiple comparisons based from inspiring English sources

Using SPM99, the statistical significance was corrected for multiple comparisons based on the size of each cluster of contiguous voxels having t>3.17, corresponding to p=0.001 uncorrected (df=100).

To identify outliers, Mahalanobis distances for the matrix of slice-wise mean and standard deviation values (concatenated) × functional volumes (time) were computed, and any values with a significant χ2 value (corrected for multiple comparisons based on the more stringent of either FDR or Bonferroni methods) were considered outliers (less than 1% of images were outliers).

Similar to the univariate GLM analysis above, significant clusters were initially masked by a gray matter mask, and then determined using a height threshold of P<0.01 and an extent threshold of P<0.05 with family-wise error correction for multiple comparisons based on nonstationary suprathreshold cluster-size distributions63.

Q-values were calculated to control for multiple comparisons based on an FDR value of 10% [47].

Activation at the threshold of t>3 with a cluster size of 10 (approximately p<0.001 corrected for multiple comparisons based on AlphaSim software [64]) was arbitrarily chosen to generally determine group activation regions.

The significance level for this analysis was p<0.0026, corresponding to a significance of p<0.05 for the whole amygdala (corrected for multiple comparisons based on the number of analyzed resolution elements).

Analysis of the cell headspace by TD-GC MS idenTD-GC MS1 common compounds that formed a data set for multidentifiedy comparisons based on TD-GC–MS quantitation (area-under-curve values) relative to media-only intra-experiment controls (Supplementary Tables S1 and S2).

All p-values are corrected for multiple non-independent comparisons based on the theory of smooth random fields (p = 0.05 FDR-corrected) [25].

Multiple pair wise comparisons based on the Mardia-Watson-Wheeler test were also used to test for inter-individual differences in stage 1 and final escape angle.

Type III sums of squares were evaluated and multiple comparisons were based on Tukey-Kramer adjusted P-values.

Moreover, since the Mann-Whitney U test is not designed to test for significance in multiple comparisons, results based on this two-sample test were verified by employing a parametric multiple-comparison method, Fisher's PLSD test (a nonparametric test for pairwise multiple comparisons was unavailable).