Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(33)
All results were strictly corrected for multiple comparison using the FWE-correction at voxel-level with a p-value of 0.05.
One-way ANOVA with Tukey's multiple comparison (using GraphPad Prism software) was used for statistical analyses of the in vitro data.
If there was a statistical difference (p<0.001), a pairwise multiple comparison using the Holm-Sidak method (overall significance level = 0.05) was performed.
Cytokine and flow cytometry data were compared using one-way ANOVA (using the non parametric Kruskal-Wallis test) with Dunns post test for multiple comparison using adult values as a reference.
A post-hoc multiple comparison using Ryan's method revealed significant differences between the right-hand and bimanual conditions and between the right- and left-hand conditions (P<0.01) for the no-visual-feedback condition.
A post-hoc multiple comparison using Ryan's method revealed significant differences between the right-hand and bimanual conditions, left-hand and bimanual conditions, and right- and left-hand conditions (P<0.05).
Similar(27)
We controlled for multiple comparisons using surrogate-based cluster statistics30.
Bretz, F., Hothorn, T. & Westfall, P. Multiple comparisons using R. (CRC Press, 2010).
We corrected for multiple comparisons using the FDR correction48 with the FDR α = 0.05.
P-values were corrected for multiple comparisons using the False-Discovery Rate and/or the Holm-Bonferroni method, as appropriate.
The resulting map (Fig. 3b) was corrected for multiple comparisons using the spatial extent method, as described above.
More suggestions(2)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com