Sentence examples for multiple comparison showed from inspiring English sources

The result of the Bonferroni multiple comparison showed that the plant biomass at the 0.6- and 1.2-km sites was significantly smaller than that at the 2.4- and 3.0-km sites (P < 0.05).

The Student-Newman-Keuls multiple comparison showed that the no-wait situation yielded a lower excitement score than did the situations with no filler, unrelated filler, and related filler, supporting Hypothesis 2 1.

The result of the Bonferroni multiple comparison showed that the coverage of nariin ovs at the 0.6-, 1.2-, and 1.8-km sites was significantly greater than the coverage at the 2.4- and 3.0-km sites (P < 0.05).

However, Friedman's test followed by Dunn's multiple comparison showed significance only for the combination arm (Fig. 3B).

Friedman's test followed by Dunn's multiple comparison showed significance only for the Nimotuzumab and the combination arms in these nude mice with the combination being more significant.

Repeated ANOVA with Scheffe's multiple comparison showed significantly different free thiol levels between the good and poor outcome groups at three different time points (within 48 h and on days 7 and 30 after stroke) (P < 0.05).

However, a post hoc Bonferroni adjustment for multiple comparisons showed that the Gemini-FRPC group showed no statistical significance.

Multiple comparisons showed that LF% was significantly lower in homozygous Arg16 carriers compared to subjects with the Arg16/Gly16 genotype (p = 0.016), but not to homozygous Gly16 carriers (p = 0.985).

Multiple comparisons showed statistical differences between 0 h and 6 h after scenting the solution with LIO (p<0.0001; Fig. 3B) and between 0 h and 24 h (p<0.0001, Fig. 3B), but not between 6 h and 24 h (p>0.05, Fig. 3B).

In addition, for biting and formic acid projection, multiple comparisons showed that, compared to a nestmate (homocolonial test) and both of the two control tests, the duration of these behaviors was significantly greater toward an ant belonging to a different species (heterospecific test) (Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney U test using Bonferroni's sequential adjustment method, α = 0.05).

The Newman-Keuls post-hoc test for multiple comparisons showed that whereas no difference in the amount of altruistic lies between the R block and the NR block was found, subjects produced more self-gain lies in the NR block respect to the R block (Figure 1).