Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(60)
One-way ANOVA with Tukey's multiple comparison procedure was used to compare differences between groups.
A multiple comparison procedure for comparing several treatments with a control.
After the ANOVA, all the saline groups were compared with the saline saline group and all nicotine groups to the nicotine nicotine group by using the Dunnett's multiple comparison procedure (Dunnett, 1955).
To isolate the group or groups that differ from the others, a multiple comparison procedure was used (Bonferroni t test).
If a statistical difference among groups was found, a multiple comparison procedure with Dunn's method was performed to establish the existence of difference among pairs.
All parameters were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post hoc Student Newman Keuls multiple comparison procedure using SigmaStat 3.5 software.
Table 1 summarizes the results of multiple comparison procedure.
Statistical significance was determined using a Kruskal-Wallis one-way ANOVA followed by the Tukey Test multiple comparison procedure.
Multiple comparison procedure confirmed the activation-dependent V0 of voluntarily activated muscle (15%MVC vs. 85%MVC, P = 0.005).
Statistical analysis was performed using the confidence interval of a proportion, one-way analysis of variance and the all-pairwise multiple comparison procedure (Holm Sidak method).
A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and a Tukey-Kramer multiple comparison procedure was performed to analyze correlation between receptor level and apoptosis rate.
More suggestions(15)
multiple alignment procedure
multiple comparison adjustment
multiple comparison p
multiple range procedure
multiple comparison correction
multiple zooming procedure
multiple comparison issue
multiple visit procedure
multiple regression procedure
multiple transplant procedure
multiple step procedure
multiple comparison test
multiple imputation procedure
multiple testing procedure
multiple comparison testing
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com