Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(52)
The Tukey test was applied for multiple comparison analysis with P < 0.05, indicating significant statistical difference.
Significant differences among groups were allocated by post hoc Student-Newman-Keuls (SNK) multiple comparison analysis at a = 0.05.
Regarding the height of augmented sinus floor postoperatively, a multiple comparison analysis revealed a significant difference between the groups.
The Kruskal-Wallis test and a subsequent Mann-Whitney U test were used for multiple comparison analysis of the clarity levels.
For the secondary outcome, it was decreased to the threshold of 0.0167 for detecting statistically significant results after adjusting for subgroup multiple comparison analysis (Bonferroni correction).
Behavioral date was analyzed by a two-way repeated measures analysis of variance followed by Bonferroni test as the multiple comparison analysis.
Similar(7)
Statistical significance was tested with unpaired two-tailed Student's t-tests, or for multiple comparisons analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey Kramer HSD posthoc tests.
One-way ANOVA multiple comparisons analysis.
For multiple comparisons, analysis of variance (ANOVA) was followed by Tamhane's T2 post hoc test.
For multiple comparisons, analysis of variance by the ranks was performed and multiple comparisons were performed using the Dunn method.
For multiple comparisons, analysis of variance using a Bonferroni correction for the number of comparisons was used.
More suggestions(15)
multiple criteria analysis
multiple testing analysis
multiple comparision analysis
multiple comparison post
multiple comparison procedure
multiple model analysis
multiple comparison p
multiple comparison adjustment
multiple comparison correction
multiple comparison issue
multiple resolution analysis
multiple correspondence analysis
multiple sequence analysis
multiple imputation analysis
multiple correlation analysis
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com