Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(19)
Fertility clinics are reducing multiple birth rates by encouraging women to have only one embryo implanted at a time.
The HFEA says that fertility clinics must bring down multiple birth rates to no more than 15%.
To determine the effect of elective single ET (eSET) on live birth and multiple birth rates by a cycle-level and clinic-level analysis.
In many ways these changes have been positive as technology has improved, in vitro culture has improved, and embryo selection increasingly allows a single embryo transfer with high success rates and ever smaller multiple birth rates.
To explore whether recently enacted infertility mandates including coverage for assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatment in New Jersey (2001) and Connecticut (2005) increased ART use, improved embryo transfer practices, and decreased multiple birth rates.
To develop a model predictive of live-birth rates (LBR) and multiple birth rates (MBR) for an individual considering assisted reproduction technology (ART) using linked cycles from Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System SART CORSS) for 2004 2011.
Similar(41)
To analyze factors associated with high live birth rate and low multiple birth rate in fresh and frozen thawed assisted reproductive technology (ART) cycles.
To determine whether a policy of elective single-embryo transfer (e-SET) lowers the multiple birth rate without compromising the live birth rate.
The purpose of this study was to use a validated prediction model to examine whether single embryo transfer (SET) over 2 cycles results in live birth rates (LBR) comparable with 2 embryos transferred (DET) in 1 cycle and reduces the probability of a multiple birth (ie, multiple birth rate [MBR]).
Reproductive technologies have greatly increased the multiple birth rate in recent years.
Among IVF pregnancies resulting in a live birth, the study found a 29-percent multiple birth rate in mandated states versus 33percentt in non-mandated states.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com