Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(5)
Out of 109 respondents, 28 denied regularly measuring IAP due to the reasons presented (% of respondents, multiple answers; question 2).
Of the 109 respondents, 81 elaborated on when to measure IAP (% of respondents, multiple answers; question 2). Figure 2 Patient groups which are regularly IAP monitored.
Eighty-one stated their criteria regarding in which kind of patients IAP should be measured (% of respondents, multiple answers; question 4).
Ninety-four restatedntheirated their criteria concerning when performing decompressive laparotomy dependend on IAP and organ dysfunction (% of respondents, multiple answers; question 5).
The major reasons cited for immunization refusal in pre- and post-campaign databases (on a multiple answers question) are illustrated in Figure 1 below.
Similar(55)
However, performance was far better on the multiple answers questions (75%) compared with multiple choice (52%).
There were noted defaults in two multiple – answer questions.
These two answers were added in a significantly high rate and were not included in the multiple – answer questions a priori, as it should be.
Furthermore, we found that multiple answer questions (several answers possible) compared with multiple choice questions (one answer possible; color coded in Figure 2B) were not obviously different with respect to the difficulty or discrimination index.
It was noted during the elaboration of the results, that a lot of parents had added an extra answer in the option "other" in two multiple – answer questions (extra option "job" for question 14 and an extra option "inhalers" for question 24).
We developed a novel hybrid assessment strategy in which students are asked to solve standard crossing tasks first on paper, after which their performance is assessed step-by-step using electronically marked jumbled sentence, multiple choice or multiple answer questions (Blackboard terminology; see the section Materials and Methods).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com