Set a global resilience agenda: Inform multilateral processes and structures.
A particular advantage with our proposed origins and proto-institutional approach is that it helps to explain the actors, interests, and coalitions leading to the formation of governance arrangements within multilateral agencies, the board structure, rules, and accountability processes.
The rehabilitation teams also saw a need for action as regards (a) moderation of the meeting, (b) prerequisites and framework conditions for team meetings, (c) active involvement of team members in the form of multilateral communication, (d) the meeting structure, and (e) the recording and review of treatment goals.
A clear limitation of both this study and that of the original study by Menon-Johansson is the reliance on country level data on health and structure compiled by the multilateral agencies.
The United States and Europe can and must take a leadership role in defining the principles and structures of this new multipolar, multilateral world.
Through this comparative approach, we may also discover challenges that affect all types of multilateral health agencies, regardless of their originating structures, policy roles, and missions.
In practice, representative decision-making in multilateral organisations can be compromised by organisational structures that allow for key agenda setting decisions to be made outside of the representative structures or through the provision of multiple ear-marked funds that distort broader sectorial strategies [ 18].
As the multilateral system takes on ever more issues, this structure may become unworkable.
Such institutional design works because parties do not behave like an economic man but do have propensity to faithfully comply in a tightly woven international interdependence structure as the experience of past multilateral international agreements suggest.
They concern the structural weaknesses that bedevil multilateral efforts.
