'multilateral processes' is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
You can use it to refer to a process or agreement that involves multiple parties or countries. For example: "Multilateral processes are often the most effective way to achieve a global agreement on a difficult issue."
But we need a step change in approach if we're to secure them – learning lessons from Rio+20 and other multilateral processes.
The aim is to create a link between the on-ground action by these organisations with the political leadership that multilateral processes provide, as well as governance.
That system must emphasize prevention of atrocities as much as protection once they are underway, and must operate through multilateral processes carefully designed to avoid manipulation of R2P for political purposes.
As Mark Malloch Brown, the UN's British and supposedly pro-Washington deputy secretary-general, noted in a speech in New York this summer, even moderate countries now suspect that "anything the United States supports must have a secret agenda aimed either at subordinating multilateral processes to Washington's ends or weakening the institutions" and "should be opposed without any real discussion".
Set a global resilience agenda: Inform multilateral processes and structures.
The G7 governments can work together to contribute towards breaking down sectoral barriers and siloed approaches that until now have hindered the ability of multilateral processes and institutions in the field of development work and humanitarian aid to comprehensively deal with climate-fragility risks.
"The consensus which was ringing and very strong was for a multilateral process," Mr. Sharma said.
A multilateral process for devising a stable, representative, post-Assad government will take time.
Further, aviation is intrinsically international, so effecting change typically requires a lengthy multilateral process.
We are clear that the way forward is through engagement in the multilateral process and specfically through the UNFCCC negotiations.
On the contrary, they both distract governments from the multilateral process and offer cover for politicians' failure to advance it.
