Our multifactorial analysis indicates that both R1699Q and A1708V are not high-risk variants, but functional analyses have shown that each displays either intermediate or defective phenotype in some but not all assays (Table 2), raising the possibility that these variants may be associated with a low to moderate risk of cancer.
Data was analysed using a mixed, multifactorial analysis of variance (ANOVA) with repeated measurements.
Data were processed by means of a multifactorial analysis of variance (ANOVA).
A multifactorial analysis of variance was performed using the 2k factorial design, always considering the C4 as the lower level.
A multifactorial analysis of variance did not show significant differences in duration of flow between subjects with migraine with or without aura and controls (group effect F 2,108) = 0.85, p = 0.43).
Although previous studies have analysed how discount rate affects SEV (Davis et al. 2001), there have been few attempts to identify long-term forest management strategies through a multifactorial analysis.
de Pádua et al. conducted a retrospective multifactorial analysis and concluded that patients older than 60 years of age were 1.5 times more likely to have a neomycin allergy [9, 17].
The impact of different preprocessing choices is assessed on a real world dataset from direct marketing using a multifactorial analysis of variance on various performance metrics and method parameterisations.
Statistical multifactorial analysis showed all the studied variables including the operating pressure (PTM), crossflow velocity (vt) and operating temperature (T) remarkably influence the permeate flux yielded by the selected membrane (p-value practically equal to zero), confirming a statistically significant relationship among the variables considered at 95% confidence level.
A multifactorial analysis of variance with sex and handedness classification as the between-subjects factors revealed a significant interaction for the anterior midbody [F 1, 5) = 18.82, p = .007, η2 = .57], and a borderline significant effect was found for the posterior midbody [F 1,5) = 5.40, p = .07, η2 = .29].
