Similar(8)
We have validated above the multi-watermark detector using a static function, (mathcal {I}), to define the multi-watermark and different performance loss between single- and multi-watermarks.
We next present the results and validations obtained for a system with the same performance loss between single- and multi-watermark detectors and where the multi-watermark is generated from a non-static function, (mathcal {I}_{d}).
Fig. 12 Numeric simulation results using the single- and multi-watermark detection schemes with the same performance loss, and different adversary window size for eavesdropping the data channel before the attack.
Fig. 10 Numeric simulation results using the single- and multi-watermark detection schemes with the same performance loss, different adversary system order, and a window size equal to 200. a Detection ratio regarding single-watermark for systems of order ten.
In this simulation, single- and multi-watermark detectors have 30% performance loss, Δ J, with respect to the optimal cost.
Fig. 8 Numeric simulation results using the single- and multi-watermark detection schemes with the same performance loss.
In Fig. 8 a, we show the result of using both single- and multi-watermark for a system of order four.
Figure 8 shows the result obtained after running 200 Monte Carlo simulations of a system with single- and multi-watermark detectors against a non-parametric cyber-physical adversary.
Related(1)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com