Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Similar(60)
Together the two tools create a formal multi-site programming workflow designed to reduce the chance of accidental PHI disclosure.
The workplan template and PHI checklist described above support the overall HMORN workflow by providing consistent workflows for the multi-site programming approach.
We formed a working group of HMORN site programmers and investigators (PHI Work Group) with more than 30 combined years of multi-site programming experience.
The lead programmer writes the data extraction code based on common multi-site programming principles, such as those described in the HMORN toolkit (http://www.hmoresearchnetwork.org/resources/toolkit/HMORN_CollaborationToolkit.pdf).org/resources/toolkit/HMORN_CollaborationToolkit.pdf
The first tool, a workplan template, guides the lead programmer through effectively communicating the details of multi-site programming, including how to run the program, what output the program will create, and whether the output is expected to contain protected health information.
Together the performance support tools meet the five requirements that were identified as necessary to support data security and privacy in a multi-site programming environment: 1. Allow for a range of PHI characteristics: Both performance support tools can be customized for projects with different levels of PHI.
Come and learn about our multi-site program in the Netherlands and Belgium.
The first tool is a workplan template that helps programmers create consistent multi-site programs.
In addition, some multi-site programs create reports that provide summary information about the datasets to help site analysts review the data.
The workplan template guides the lead programmer through creating a comprehensive workplan that will support site analysts in running and evaluating the multi-site program.
The second section of the workplan template leads the programmer to describe the file structure used by the multi-site program.
More suggestions(2)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com