Secrecy outage probability of multicast cooperative relay network is also studied in [19], in the presence of multi-destination and multi-eavesdropper nodes.
In this paper, we consider multi-source multi-destination multi-layer wireless networks, and we seek fundamental limits of communications when sources have limited local views of the network.
We propose criteria for assessing when multicast routing can effectively be used, and compare multi-destination multicast and host group multicast using these criteria.
We also work with an individual as the decisionmaker which allows us to avoid specifying family decision processes and to derive aggregate net migration equations in a multi-motivation, multi-destination setting.
A last-minute destination change can be frustrating for both drivers and passengers, but now multi-destination helps in driver planning and in avoiding the downsides of queuing close proximity rides.
This is the kind of laidback place to end a multi-destination journey, peaceful, affordable and with a friendly staff.
We consider a multi-source multi-destination wireless network which consists of N sources and destinations, denoted by S i and D i, i=1,…,N, in the presence of a friendly jammer J and an eavesdropping node E which eavesdrops erratically, as illustrated in Figure 1.
To better understand our objective, consider a multi-source multi-destination multi-layer wireless network.
The use of cooperative multi hopping technique helps the wireless nodes to route between node to node, node to multi-hop destination node, and node to base station, i.e., internet backhaul.
This paper proposes a bargaining-based jammer power allocation scheme for multi-source multi-destination wireless network in the presence of a friendly jammer and a malicious node which eavesdrops erratically.
Many peer-to-peer overlay operations are inherently parallel and this parallelism can be exploited by using multi-destination multicast routing, resulting in significant message reduction in the underlying network.
