Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
much was at risk
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "much was at risk" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that there are significant stakes or potential consequences involved in a situation. Example: "In the final moments of the negotiation, much was at risk, and both parties knew they had to reach an agreement."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Science
Academia
Alternative expressions(1)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
2 human-written examples
He said much was at risk following its closure.
News & Media
All of the participants emphasised how much was at risk.
Science
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
58 human-written examples
If this prop does not pass, much is at risk.
Indeed people are amazed how little benefit will be gained and how much is at risk.
News & Media
The majority of businesses do not hedge against weather risks, nor do they have an accurate view on how much is at risk.
News & Media
Analysis of the facts shows just how much is at risk by leaving Euratom, and how complex this process is, given the government's unnecessary, self-imposed deadline.
News & Media
She puts in sixteen-hour days because she knows how much is at risk.
Academia
If the great divide widens and Germany digs in its heels then much is at risk.
News & Media
Much is at risk.
News & Media
We cannot be complacent, far too much is at risk".
News & Media
This is the only responsible course of action, and far too much is at risk to do otherwise.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Use "much was at risk" to emphasize the potential for significant negative consequences in a situation. It adds weight and seriousness to your statement.
Common error
Avoid using "much was at risk" when describing minor inconveniences or trivial problems. This phrase is best reserved for scenarios with genuinely high stakes or serious potential consequences, as it can sound hyperbolic if used inappropriately.
Source & Trust
88%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "much was at risk" functions as a descriptive phrase, indicating that a situation involves significant potential loss or negative consequences. Ludwig AI indicates that this phrase is correct and usable in written English.
Frequent in
News & Media
35%
Science
33%
Academia
32%
Less common in
Formal & Business
0%
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "much was at risk" is a grammatically sound and effective way to convey that a situation carries significant potential for loss or negative consequences. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and usability. While not exceedingly common, it's appropriate for various contexts, particularly news, scientific, and academic discussions. When using this phrase, ensure the context genuinely warrants a sense of high stakes. Consider alternatives like "a great deal was at stake" or "significant consequences were possible" for nuanced variations.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
a great deal was at stake
Emphasizes the importance of the outcome, focusing on what could be gained or lost.
significant consequences were possible
Highlights the potential negative outcomes or repercussions.
the stakes were high
Focuses on the elevated level of risk and potential loss.
a lot could be lost
Directly states the potential for negative outcomes or forfeits.
there was a high degree of hazard
Highlights the peril and possibility of harm.
considerable danger existed
Focuses on the presence of a substantial threat.
the situation was precarious
Highlights the instability and potential for adverse outcomes.
serious repercussions were anticipated
Emphasizes the expected negative consequences.
substantial losses were in prospect
Indicates the expectation of significant forfeits or damages.
everything was on the line
Focuses on the idea that all one's resources and prospects hung in the balance.
FAQs
What does "much was at risk" mean?
The phrase "much was at risk" signifies that a situation involves a high degree of potential loss or negative consequences. It implies that the outcome is important and that failure could result in significant damage or harm.
What can I say instead of "much was at risk"?
You can use alternatives like "a great deal was at stake", "significant consequences were possible", or "the stakes were high" to convey a similar meaning.
Is "much was at risk" formal or informal?
"Much was at risk" is suitable for both formal and informal contexts. It is often found in news articles, academic papers, and general discussions where serious consequences are being discussed.
How do I use "much was at risk" in a sentence?
You can use "much was at risk" to describe a situation where the potential for negative outcomes is high. For example, "In the negotiations, much was at risk for both companies" or "With the impending storm, much was at risk for the coastal communities".
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
88%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested