Sentence examples for much stronger selection from inspiring English sources

Artificially selected populations can be subjected to much stronger selection pressures than natural populations, thus their adaption to a new experimental environment can be considered to be a process of accelerated evolution.

Thus, a gain-of-function phenotype may display much stronger selection bias to a subset of target genes, making such target(s) easier to detect.

These chromosomes have probably undergone much stronger selection or, more parsimoniously, higher genetic drift, due to their unique inheritance [ 6], and the history of domestication, selection, breed formation.

The results presented here suggest that, while a proportion of the genome is subject to much stronger selection in females than males, most genes with female-biased expression experience selection in males.

A likely much stronger selection force for uniparental inheritance will arise if an organelle with a higher replication speed carries a genotype that is incompatible with or maladaptive to the host nucleus.

In our system, frameshifts experienced much stronger selection than any other class of mutation, and it is possible that using a Δ mutS hypermutator altered the rate of appearance of indel mutations relative to base substitutions (Marvig et al. 2013).

A likely explanation is that offspring are much more vulnerable to IGP than are the adult females themselves (Croft et al. 1996), rendering oviposition site selection a much stronger selective force than prey patch selection.

This observation indicates a much stronger purifying selection among Mt mt Contact residues than among Mt nu Contact amino acids.

As it is difficult to obtain analytical results for the general two-locus diffusion problem (Ethier and Nagylaki 1980 , 1988 , 1989Ewens 2004), we assume that recombination is much stronger than selection and migration.

The second concerns the infinitesimal mean M p) of the change in the frequency of A1: assuming that recombination is much stronger than selection and migration, we may approximate Equation 5 by M ρ ≫ 0 (p ) = α p (1 − p ) − μ p + μ ρ p (16 for a monomorphic continent.

That is, although Mt nu Contact residues, regardless of the subunit being analyzed, showed similar selective pressures as assessed by ω, the Exposed Noncontact residues from COX I seem to be subjected to a much stronger purifying selection when compared with COX II and COX III subunits (fig. 3).