Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(6)
The thermal conductivity values of graphene, whose length and width are 3.6 and 5.52 μm, respectively, were measured as 2430 ± 190, 2150 ± 170, and 2100 ± 160 W/mK at the peak temperatures of 335, 361, and 366 K, respectively, with much smaller error range compared to the previously reported values.
As can clearly be observed, our approach results in much smaller error than that of [11] for the whole considered range of SNR in the three examples.
By comparing Table 1 and Table 2, we find that Newton-SOR has a much shorter CPU time, much less iterations, and much smaller error than Newton iterative method does.
This indicates that for any WGA method, a higher call rate will also lead to a much smaller error rate.
In the other 53 runs, GD finds solutions with small gradients (mostly <0.05) and much smaller error (average 7.24, median 3.07).
Recently, however, Fan et al. (2011) and Yang et al. (2011) proposed new experimental techniques for whole-chromosome haplotyping, which promise to achieve much smaller error rates than current methods.
Similar(54)
The optimized simulator has errors of less than 16% compared with direct program measurement in all the cases we studied, and typically much smaller errors.
By contrast, soot temperature and volume fraction gradients across the field of view introduce much smaller errors of less than 50 K in temperature and 20% in volume fraction.
Experiments with single and multiple circular and elliptical rotating patches of both piecewise constant and smooth vorticity indicate that the method produces much smaller errors than blob methods with the same number of degrees of freedom, at little additional cost.
At point 17,21 and 24, our hybrid method gets much smaller errors than GPS.
First, it is shown that the proposed CPD estimation methods (IPD-based and RPD-based) produce much smaller errors in CPD1 than the conventional method used in PS.
More suggestions(15)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com