Sentence examples for much smaller datasets from inspiring English sources

In contrast to previous analyses on much smaller datasets, the monophyly of DIRS1-like elements is not supported in the present study (bootstrap support lower than 75%).

This length difference was suggested by previous analyses of much smaller datasets from the plasma membrane and the Golgi (Bretscher and Munro, 1993; Levine et al., 2000) but is unequivocally validated by these much larger datasets.

The much smaller datasets for bovine serum albumin (BSA), yeast alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) and human transferrin (TRF) recorded with a 3D IT mass spectrometer (model DecaXP Thermo Finnigan) were reused from our previous work [ 24].

Estimates in Sweden (16%) (6 ), the Netherlands (17%) (11 ), and the United States (40%) (3 ) were all higher; however, figures from these countries are derived from much smaller datasets.

Although some studies have reported datasets comprising up to 34 leachate analyses, these are composites of much smaller datasets from different phases of prolonged eruptions spread over days or weeks (e.g. Chaitén, Durant et al. 2012; Eyjafjallajökull, Bagnato et al. 2013).

This agrees with an earlier finding (Tsyganenko 1998, Fig 4) based on a much smaller dataset, as well as with the result of a magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) simulation run,which is presented next in Fig. 9.

Note that deletion imputation that uses a much smaller dataset has a very high variance (σ ≈18) in its performance.

As inferred previously based upon a much smaller dataset [ 15], it includes genes encoding the C type lectins such as MRC1, and the signalling molecules TLR4 and MAP3K2.

Section boundaries for hvrs were based on the alignment in Baldo et al. [ 31], where a similar analysis was performed using a much smaller dataset.

Tabaska and Zhang identified a similar DSE using a much smaller dataset and a motif-search tool (gibbs-seq) searching for two copies per fragment, while we required only one occurrence per sequence.

In this study, we explored the connectedness of the two cross-border epidemics over time and found, similar to our previous work (Mehta et al., 2010), which used a much smaller dataset and less detailed methods, that the two epidemics were mostly separate.