Patients in pain may have much poorer reaction times and may be a much greater risk.
Thus, our analysis is concerned only with relative differences between conditions, as accuracy in verbally applying metric values to perceptual stimuli typically shows much poorer performance than a motor response (Andre & Rogers, 2006), particularly with looming sounds (Neuhoff, 2001).
YCS was carried out in several sweeps, with information on GCSE results and intentions to take A level obtained at sweep 1. Information on actual attainment at A level was obtained only at sweep 3, and inevitably the response rate was much poorer.
However, for the specific selection of patients with a complete tumour response (yT0) results – in particular PPV – are much poorer, and up to 80% of patients with a complete response are over-staged as having residual tumour [15,30].
The national response to cancer has been much poorer.
Yet, the prognosis of invasive fusariosis is much poorer than for invasive aspergillosis, with very low response rates and most patients with disseminated Fusarium infection dying [ 1].
Patients in negative response groups had distinct and much poorer healthcare descriptions than those in the extreme positive group, supporting the interpretation of quality differences between these groups.
In NSCLC, patients with a PS 2 have a much poorer prognosis and experience lower rates of tumour response to therapy than patients with PS of 0 and 1 (Hoang et al, 2005).
Patients in the negative response groups had distinct and much poorer healthcare descriptions than those in the extreme positive group, supporting the interpretation of quality differences between these statistically derived groups.
When comparing the septic patient responses in gene expression, with animal models of disuse, in general a much poorer agreement is observed.
