much more weaker

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "much more weaker" is not correct in English.
The correct form would be "much weaker" or "weaker." Example: "This new material is much weaker than the previous version."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

The condition is inspired by (a1) in Dudziński [8], which is much more weaker.

Journal of Inequalities and Applications

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

The actual plot in itself thickens beautifully as the book progresses, and Amy Dunne is one of the most phenomenal female characters I've read in a while; but there is a darkness that Flynn had in her previous works, a sinister force looming over the novel as you read it, and this was present in a much more weak, diluted form here.

The Guardian

In addition, much more weak acid sites of ZSM-5 zeolites after alkaline treatment also promoted the hydrolysis and dehydration process.

Catalysis Today

We have a mental health system that is pretty weak right now, and in danger of becoming much more weak with cuts to Medicaid… which will worsen an already bad situation, push more people onto the streets and into jails for minor crimes, which will add to the burden that police are already facing".

Vice

But it may be much more than a weaker dollar that is driving American multinational earnings and stock prices.

Forbes

Combined these make much more of a weaker acid, which then colors a dye that makes the image.

Science Magazine

But Ryu was superb after that, and the Mets could not do much more than litter weak ground balls around the Dodger Stadium infield.

The New York Times - Sports

In such problems, strong convergence or norm convergence is often much more desirable than weak convergence.

Fixed Point Theory and Applications

In such problems, strong convergence is often much more desirable than weak convergence.

Journal of Inequalities and Applications

In many situations, strong convergence of an iterative algorithm of a nonlinear map is much more desirable than weak convergence.

Fixed Point Theory and Applications

In such problems, strong convergence is often much more desirable than weak convergence, for it translates the physically tangible property.

Fixed Point Theory and Applications

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid using "much more weaker" as it is grammatically incorrect. Opt for the concise and correct "much weaker" or simply "weaker".

Common error

Do not use "much more weaker". The word "weaker" already implies a comparative degree. Adding "much more" creates a redundant comparison. Use "much weaker" or "far weaker" to emphasize the difference effectively.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "much more weaker" attempts to function as a comparative adjective phrase. However, it's grammatically incorrect due to the redundancy of using both "much more" and the comparative form "weaker". As Ludwig AI points out, this phrase is not correct.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

33%

News & Media

33%

Wiki

33%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "much more weaker" is considered grammatically incorrect due to its redundant nature. "Weaker" is already a comparative adjective, so adding "much more" is unnecessary. As Ludwig AI confirms, this is not a standard or recommended usage. Instead, opt for phrases like "much weaker", "significantly weaker", or simply "weaker" to effectively convey the intended meaning. While there are limited examples where "much more weaker" is used, it's best to avoid it in both formal and informal communication to maintain grammatical correctness.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

far weaker

Replaces "much more" with "far" to emphasize the degree of weakness.

considerably weaker

Substitutes "much more" with "considerably" to indicate a significant difference in strength.

significantly weaker

Replaces "much more" with "significantly" to highlight a notable reduction in strength.

substantially weaker

Uses "substantially" instead of "much more" to suggest a large difference in strength.

noticeably weaker

Replaces "much more" with "noticeably" to suggest an easily perceived reduction in strength.

appreciably weaker

Uses "appreciably" instead of "much more" to indicate a detectable difference in strength.

markedly weaker

Replaces "much more" with "markedly" to emphasize a clear and distinct reduction in strength.

distinctly weaker

Uses "distinctly" instead of "much more" to suggest a clear and easily noticeable reduction in strength.

decidedly weaker

Replaces "much more" with "decidedly" to indicate an unmistakable reduction in strength.

plainly weaker

Uses "plainly" instead of "much more" to suggest an obvious and evident reduction in strength.

FAQs

What is the correct way to say something is weaker?

The correct way to describe something as weaker is to use "weaker" or "much weaker". The phrase "much more weaker" is grammatically incorrect and considered redundant.

Is it ever appropriate to use the phrase "much more weaker"?

No, it is generally not appropriate to use the phrase "much more weaker" in formal or informal writing or speech. It's considered grammatically incorrect. Alternatives like "far weaker" or simply "weaker" are preferred.

What are some alternatives to "much more weaker"?

Instead of "much more weaker", you can use phrases like "much weaker", "significantly weaker", "considerably weaker", or "far weaker" to express a greater degree of weakness.

Why is "much more weaker" considered incorrect?

The phrase "much more weaker" is considered incorrect because it combines "much more", which is used to intensify adjectives, with "weaker", which is already a comparative adjective. This creates a redundancy. Using "much weaker" avoids this issue.