much more shorter

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "much more shorter" is not correct in standard written English.
The correct form would be "much shorter" or simply "shorter." Example: "This new model is much shorter than the previous version."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Wiki

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

Changing the scrolling speed means that the space between notes is larger, but this also means that the time for you to react is much more shorter, so watch out.

WikiHow

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

58 human-written examples

People make their travel plans on a much more short-term basis these days anyway.

The New York Times - Travel

He noted candidly that Goldman is much more short in this sector than usual.

The New York Times

Frankly, I think cost-saving exercises don't come much more short-sighted than this.

The Guardian

When it comes to my dad, he's much more short and snappy.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

"Up here, the focus is much more short-term," Mr. Rove continued.

The New York Times

"The focus of these young people is much more short term, more like two to three years.

The Guardian

There was some justification for this different treatment: Wachovia has much more short-term debt than WaMu, so wiping out its creditors would have caused a bigger shock.

The Economist

When you're private equity-backed, it's a much more short-term focus in how you invest and build the organization.

The New York Times

"There's much more short-term orientation and more emphasis on quarterly earnings reports today," said William H. Donaldson, a former chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission and one of the founders of Donaldson , Lufkin & Jenrette now a part of Credit Suisse.

The New York Times

In some ways, the times cry out for more active government: for stronger regulation of banks and near-banks, for much more short-term government spending to counteract the contraction elsewhere in the economy, and for the establishment of a basic health-care system for everyone.

The Economist

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid using the double comparative "much more shorter". Use "much shorter" or "significantly shorter" instead for grammatical accuracy.

Common error

Do not combine "much more" with comparative adjectives ending in '-er'. This creates redundancy. Stick to either "much shorter" or "shorter" depending on the desired emphasis.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "much more shorter" attempts to function as a comparative adjective phrase, aiming to emphasize that something is significantly less long than something else. However, Ludwig AI indicates that this construction is not considered standard English.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

60%

Science

30%

Wiki

10%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "much more shorter" is generally considered grammatically incorrect due to its redundant use of comparative forms. While Ludwig identifies some instances of its usage in diverse sources like news articles and scientific papers, it's recommended to use alternatives like "much shorter", "significantly shorter", or just "shorter" for better grammatical accuracy and clarity. Avoiding double comparatives ensures more precise and professional communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

significantly shorter

Emphasizes the degree of shortness.

considerably shorter

Highlights the extent of the reduced length.

noticeably shorter

Indicates that the difference in length is easily observed.

markedly shorter

Suggests a clear and distinct difference in length.

substantially shorter

Indicates a large difference in length.

distinctly shorter

Highlights the clearness of the reduction.

appreciably shorter

Implies a noticeable and important reduction in length.

measurably shorter

Highlights that the difference in length can be quantified.

much briefer

Uses 'briefer' as an alternative to 'shorter'.

far shorter

Emphasizes the extent of the reduction in length.

FAQs

What is the correct way to say "much more shorter"?

The correct way is to say "much shorter" or simply "shorter". The phrase "much more shorter" is redundant because "shorter" is already a comparative adjective.

Are there alternatives to "much shorter"?

Yes, you can use alternatives like "significantly shorter", "considerably shorter", or "noticeably shorter" to emphasize the difference in length.

Is "much more shorter" grammatically correct?

No, "much more shorter" is not grammatically correct. It's considered a double comparative, which is generally avoided in standard English.

When should I use "much shorter" instead of just "shorter"?

Use "much shorter" when you want to emphasize that the difference in length is significant. If the difference is obvious or doesn't need emphasis, "shorter" is sufficient.