Sentence examples for much higher coefficients from inspiring English sources

In comparison, the variations seen in the size of lacunae were much higher (coefficients of variation in volume: 30 49% and in surface area: 21 40%).

However, we do observe that lowly expressed transcripts, irrespective of age, have much higher coefficients of variation as compared to highly abundant transcripts.

Monolith made from H44 showed a much higher coefficient of thermal expansion at 77 K than monolith made from MK and APTES, probably due to difference in composition and measurement condition.

For example, in red deer, male and female annual fitness are significantly negatively genetically correlated (−0.95), but males have a much higher coefficient of additive genetic variance (1.56) compared to females (0.44) [9].

The cup area has a much higher coefficient of variation than the rim area.

The Microarray Quality Control Consortium MAQCC) study highlighted once again that in-house microarrays generate a much higher coefficient of variation for expression signals compared to commercial products [ 6].

However, the low average counts per isogroup in the 454 data set (5 reads/isogroup) relative to the Illumina data set (863 reads/isogroup) resulted in much higher coefficient of variations in the 454 data set (93%) than in the Illumina data set (20%).

The β exponents ranged between 0.9 and 1.9 across the catchments, while variability in α was much higher, with coefficients ranging between 25 and 5039.

The results indicated that the GSPI-P membranes based on the diamines with pendent phenyl moieties exhibited higher fractional free volumes than GSPI-T membranes derived from diamines with triptycene moieties; as a result, the former gave the much higher permeability coefficients.

Read frequencies exhibited much higher correlation coefficients in pair wise sample comparisons (r2 = 0.93 0.99) than array hybridization (r2 = 0.83 0.88; Fig. 5 and 6).

In contrast, the concordance correlation within the same amplification method revealed much higher average coefficients, and thus a much higher agreement (0.63 ± 0.05).