Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(15)
Response time data were examined for outliers: any response faster than 300 ms was considered a guess or an error and excluded from the analyses41,43.
The other parameters that can potentially influence the efficiency of the proposal are (i) the amount of generated traffic (in Figure 8, FTP I was used), (ii) FAPs bandwidth (in Figure 8, MHz was utilized), and (iii) the length of adaptation interval (in Figure 8, ms was considered).
The time interval from −90 ms to 20 ms was considered, which was 110 ms in duration and contained 22 sample points.
The time period from −150 ms to −50 ms was considered to be the baseline, and the time period from 0 ms to 100 ms was the 40-Hz transient response window.
A behavioural latency of 80 ms was considered for the analysis, since the onset of lateral steering in walking and flying crickets is delayed by this time relative to the stimulus onset [42].
The prestimulus period (−600 to 0 ms) was considered in comparing MEG patterns discriminating between hits and misses before NT stimulus arrival.
Similar(45)
Events lasting more than 900 ms were considered as complex movements.
Maximum delay of 1 ms is considered.
Drugs that prolong the QT interval for more that 20 ms are considered proarrhythmic and are generally not marketed [2].
Thus a temporal discrepancy of more than 500 ms is considered to be sufficient to reduce RHI effects.
Trains of action potentials preceded by a silence period of at least 50 ms and whose interspike intervals were less than 4 ms were considered as bursts [23].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com