Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(12)
We considered two cases: in the first one, drift compensation is employed according to the specifications of the proposed MAC sub-layer with guaranteed guard time of Tg = 50 ms; the second case refers to the use of a guard time of Tg = 150 ms without clock drift compensation.
Beyond 300 ms the second response is actually attenuated.
Thus the first slice represents the interaction present at a time scale of 15 ms, the second slice interaction at a time scale of 30 ms (one intervening frame) and so on.
Each trial had the following structure: a cross appeared for 400 ms in the center of the screen followed by the first image fragment for 250 ms, a white noise mask with the same size as the previously presented image for 200 ms, the second face fragment for another 250 ms and a black screen until the subject made a button press.
The main differences between the NI and RI conditions were observed at two different time periods after hand-on-object interaction: the first occurred between 62 and 130 ms; the second difference occurred between 332 and 400 ms post hand-on-object interaction (Figure 4).
The sequence of events on each trial of the categorization task was: blank interval for 882 1059 ms; first stimulus for 506 ms; blank interval for 306 424 ms; the second stimulus 906, 1000 or 1094 ms; blank interval until response.
Similar(48)
For every testing sample (4-10 s), the average time spent on the first-layer HMMs is 4.1 ms with maximum 7 ms, the second-layer HMMs 4.3 ms with maximum 7.7 ms. It shows that our system fulfills the real-time processing requirement.
Defining task-onset as 0 ms, the first post-task segment reached from 0 to 80 ms, and the second post-task segment from 80 to 120 ms, which included the P1.
Below a melting temperature T m, the second term H m /3k B in (3) should be omitted.
The grating to which attention had to be directed (cue grating) appeared first on the screen for a duration of 1000 ms. The second grating (distractor) was then displayed in front or behind the first.
The spacing between the lines was 100 m in the first plot, 50 m in the second, 33 m in the third, and 25 m in the fourth.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com