Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(3)
Both intervals were behind the initiation (270 ms) of face familiarity processing.
Fearful expressions also caused greater heart rate deceleration responses in 7-month-old infants during the first 1000 ms of face viewing [ 7].
They are also associated with different amplitudes within the time interval between 300 and 1000 ms post face stimulus, after the initiation (270 ms) of face familiarity processing.
Similar(57)
650 1500 m; on face of limestone rock, in shaded and moist broadleaf forest on mountain slope.
Approximately 30 m of the face blew out, propelling coal across the conveyor and into the shields, and causing fatal injuries to the shearer operator.
Since most of the damaged cutters were distributed along the edge of cutting wheel, only top 3 m of tunnel face within the chamber needed to be supported by compressed air, and remaining area would also to be supported by slurry pressure.
The surface level is 18.3 27.1 m, and the length of face is 212.8 m.
In each trial of the aftereffect task, a five-second presentation of the adapting face was followed by a brief presentation (400 ms) of a morphed test face (Fig. 4).
Here, during fMRI participants were required to memorize between one and four angry, happy, or neutral faces for 2,000 ms (the number of faces to be remembered is termed face load), and one second later they were asked to report whether a single face probe matched in identity to one of the previous to-be-remembered faces or not (Fig. 1).
Face information and grating information are similarly affected by TMS pulses between 50 and 100 ms after stimulus onset, indicating recurrent processing in the visual cortex during the first 100 ms. For face images, this TMS interference remains noticeable for longer integrating windows (110 130 ms), indicating longer recurrent processing of face information relative to grating information.
The distance between the adjacent faces was 24 m and the straight entry upstream of face 1 measured 21 m.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com