Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(6)
Comparison of mean-square (MS) errors for several soil properties and surface residue mass measured at this site, with those from a nearby plot-scale experiment, revealed that ECa-classified within-field variance approximates plot-scale experimental error.
Figure 2 MS errors of the WL estimator (5) (solid line) and the estimator calculated in step 5 with n = 25 terms (dotted line) and with n = 50 terms (dashed line).
Figure 3 MS errors for the SL estimator with n = 10 terms (crossed line) and for the WL estimator with n = 2 terms (dashed line), with n = 4 terms (dotted line), and with n = 10 terms (solid line).
Figure 2 depicts the MS error PWL t) together with the MS errors of the WL estimator obtained from the RR method with n = 25 and n = 50 terms in step 5 of the algorithm, which have been generated by Monte Carlo simulation (a total of 10,000 simulations were performed).
In Figure 3, we compare the MS error of the SL estimator calculated with n = 10 terms with the MS errors of the WL estimator with n = 2, 4 and, 10 terms (which account for 57.60, 82.30 and 93.88% of the total variance of x t), respectively).
We have limited the estimation interval to [2, 6] because of the observed stabilization of the MS errors for t ≥ 4. Apart from the better performance of the WL estimator with respect to the SL estimator (as was to be expected), the rapid convergence of the RR estimators is also confirmed.
Similar(54)
Slices 1795 133%) Latency 11.43 ms Error pixels Figure 21 (a) Checkerboard image before distortion correction.
Table 2 presents the average reaction times (ms), error rates, and standard deviation for each group of words.
Affected by the seismic resolution and sand shale velocity difference, there is up to a 6 ms error between the geological time-equivalent surface of slice A and that corresponding to the fourth-period channel (slice B position).
Following observers' search task response and another blank interval of 200 ms, error feedback and feedback indicating monetary reward was given.
A 16 ms error is inherent in the presentation of visual stimuli due to the 60 Hz refresh rate of the LCD monitor.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com