Sentence examples for ms compared with from inspiring English sources

It increased the recognition accuracy by 4% and decreased the recognition duration by 112 ms compared with Hu's moment method.

Low-arousal negative words were processed more slowly and elicited a reduction of N170 (140–200 ms) compared with high-arousal negative words.

The electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) measurement shows that the TNRSF film possesses better electron transport ability and longer electron lifetime (28.4 ms) compared with the TiO2 nanoparticals (TNPs) film.

When the popularity is 10 and the increasing rate is 0.5, the RTT is decreased by 10 ms compared with the random caching.

Besides that, the slightly shorter TE of BLADE (86 ms compared with 101 ms for conventional TSE) does not appear to explain the quantitative contrast differences encountered.

The modified propofol model is phenomenologically similar to the original propofol model, which shows rebound spiking only for values of τ s between 8 and 48 ms (compared with the modified model: 8 21 ms) and was also examined using geometric singular perturbation theory [18].

The results showed that subjects felt significantly greater RHI effects with temporal discrepancies of less than 300 ms compared with longer temporal discrepancies.

The Form color K1 response shows a strong retardation of latency around Yellow – Green of almost 25 ms compared with end spectral values (as noted above for Figure 6).

Kellenbach et al. [31], using ERP, found that the earliest effect associated with semantic attributes was elicited by motor words at about 250 ms, compared with abstract and visual words.

Deuteron labeling of the methyl groups of methylated BSA led to a minor increase in T1 (2313 vs. 2080 ms) and no change in T2 values (273 vs. 275 ms) compared with 1H-methylated BSA (Table 1).

Participants were faster responding to Hiragana items (847 ms) compared with Kanji items (904 ms; F1,33 = 27.3, P < 0.001) and for words (815 ms) compared with nonwords (937 ms; F1,33 = 17.3, P < 0.001).