Sentence examples for moving average concentration from inspiring English sources

The estimated relative odds for the 24-hr moving average concentration was positive (OR > 1), but not statistically significant.

Studies have shown that models of single day lags might underestimate the effect of air pollution on mortality, 17 thus we used a moving average concentration over two days (lag 0-1) fourour main analyses.

In single-day lag models, lag 0 referred to the current-day air pollutants concentration, and lag 1 corresponded to the previous-day concentration; while in multiday lag models, lag 0 1 meant the 2-day moving average concentration of current day and the previous day.

An IQR increase in the 4-day moving average concentration of PMc (lag03) was associated with 1.94%95%5% CI: 1.24%, 2.64%), 3.37% (2.26%, 4.49%), and 2.32% (0.14%, 4.55%) increases in emergency hospital admissions for total respiratory diseases, COPD, and asthma, respectively (Table 3).

Second, we estimated effects using different lag structures, including single-day lags (from lag 0 for the current day to lag 5 for the 24-hr average exposure 5 days prior to the current day) and the 6-day moving average concentration for the current day and the previous 5 days (lag 05).

Results: A 10.9-μg/m (interquartile range) increase in the 4-day moving average concentration of PMc was associated with a 1.94%95%5% confidence interval: 1.24%, 2.64%) increase in emergency hospital admissions for respiratory diseases that was attenuated but still significant after controlling for PM2.5.

Individuals with concurrent diabetes, obesity, and hypertension exhibited large positive associations between ambient BC, NO2, and O3 and CRP and IL-6, as shown for the 5-day moving average concentrations in Table 3.

This comparison model consisted of the base model described above with the inclusion of a linear term (β*pollutant) for each of the three pollutants, modeled using the continuous 3-day moving average concentrations.

The 4-hr moving average PM2.5 concentration was 0.48 ± 0.01 mg/m, ranging from nearly nondetectable to 4.23 mg/m.

In a study of 12 major Canadian cities, Burnett et al. (2004) associated a 30.6-ppb change in 2-day moving average O3 concentration with a 2.74% change in nonaccidental mortality.

However, in a Canadian study, Burnett et al. (2004) found that a 22.4-ppb increase in 3-day moving average NO2 concentrations was associated with a 2.31% increase in nonaccidental mortality.