Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
The overall number of steps taken per day, and the UPDRS motor subscale did not contribute to the model.
Similar(59)
The fear and avoidance subscales demonstrated highly significant correlations with remaining item totals; however, the physiological subscale did not.
The trait-related subscale differentiated the genotypes whereas the job-related subscale did not.
Specifically, the health worry subscale did not fare as well as the cancer worry subscale.
This subscale did not initially fit the Rasch model.
The factor structure for the subscales and the alphas for each subscale did not change according to test order.
Notably, high scores on the avoidance subscale did not co-occur with low scores on the Cognitive Fusion subscale.
While the 'negative appraisal' subscale showed strong discriminatory power, the positive subscale did not differ between treatment groups.
LOS, falls, home services, discharge placement, total FIM, motor FIM, and 7 of 8 of the SF-36 subscales did not differ between the groups.
Other subscales did not show significant differences.
However, individual subscales did demonstrate good reliability.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com