Exact(1)
Electrophysiological recordings in PD patients support the presence of a motor subdivision in the dorsolateral part of the STN (Rodriguez-Oroz et al. 2001).
Similar(59)
Main goal of this study was the detailed topological characterization of limbic, associative, and motor subdivisions of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) in relation to corresponding corticosubcortical circuits.
The scheme includes connections originating in primary and higher order sensory cortex, primary motor cortex, subdivisions of premotor and supplementary motor areas and areas of prefrontal cortex just rostral to motor cortex, arranged in a hierarchy according to the characteristics of forward and backward connections in Table 1.
The image sets are from 5 anatomically distinct injection sites representing several major brain subdivisions: primary motor area (MOp), centromedial nucleus of the thalamus (CM), medial preoptic area of the hypothalamus (MPO), pontine central gray (PCG), and intermediate reticular nucleus of the medulla (IRN).
These divisions are roughly equivalent to motor, associative and limbic subdivisions but exist more as a dorsolateral to ventromedial gradient [3].
Many behaviors are thought to consist of subdivisions of simpler motor programs.
Besides differentiating between cognitive and motor fatigue, this scale offers a subdivision into different grades of fatigue severity.
Interestingly, the interspike interval was longer in the putative motor area as compared to the limbic/associative subdivision of the STN (Welter et al. 2011).
Its myriad subdivisions look into memory processing, motor control, language, drug development, neurodegenerative diseases and nerve damage, and so on.
We suggest that some of the subdivisions previously described within primary motor and premotor cortex may represent different types of actions that monkeys tend to make in different regions of space.
Likewise, a subdivision of the dentate nucleus in a more dorsal and rostral motor domain and a more ventral and caudal non-motor domain has been proposed by Dum and Strick (2003) based on anatomical studies in monkey.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com