Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(19)
Results suggest that the premotor cortex is involved in online monitoring and controlling of spatio-temporal features of trajectories while the motor cortex contributes to the execution of movements.
However, how the motor cortex contributes to this atypical activation pattern remains unclear.
This double dissociation indicates that the hand motor cortex contributes to response bias during demanding discrimination tasks, whereas the articulatory motor cortex contributes to perception of speech sounds.
The interpretation that the motor cortex contributes to speech perception has been challenged.
We investigated whether the human articulatory motor cortex contributes to the neural mechanisms underlying auditory discrimination.
Whether this activity is epiphenomenal or whether the articulatory motor cortex contributes to perception of clear speech remained unanswered.
Similar(41)
Also, importantly, the articulatory motor cortex contributed to sensitivity, independently of response bias in our study.
It was demonstrated that the cerebellum and the motor cortex both contribute to adequate paw placement and limb trajectory [33], [34] and that the posterior parietal cortex is rather involved in planning gait modification [35].
Importantly, the lack of change in SICI does not exclude the possibility of altered motor cortex excitability contributing to the increase in quadriceps MEP amplitude during pain.
Moreover, recent transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) studies provide evidence that the premotor cortex and the representations of articulators (i.e. the lips and tongue) in the left primary motor (M1) cortex contribute to the discrimination of ambiguous speech sounds (Meister et al. 2007; D'Ausilio et al. 2009; Möttönen and Watkins 2009).
In the motor cortex, callosal input contributes to the activation of the ipsilateral muscles but only by potentiating the corticofugal projections of the contralateral motor cortex (Brus-Ramer et al. 2009).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com