Suggestions(5)
Exact(5)
Microglial morphology and motility were evaluated before, during, and after superfusion of each agent.
Volume, pH, and sperm concentration and motility were evaluated according to WHO guidelines [ 12].
During the whole production period volume, mass activity, sperm concentration and motility were evaluated routinely, while sperm morphology was only assessed occasionally.
The gastric emptying time and small intestinal motility were evaluated by MTS-1, and the total gastrointestinal transit time was assessed by radiopaque markers and abdominal radiographs.
Intra- and inter-technician variations in the assessment of sperm concentration and motility were evaluated several times before and during the study and were considered satisfactory, the coefficients of variation being typically around 5 to 10%.
Similar(55)
The post-thaw motility was evaluated with a light microscope for the percentage of progressively motile spermatozoa, total motility percentage and a velocity score (from 1 to 3).
Sperm motility was evaluated by computer assisted sperm analysis system.
In the first experiment, the effect of glycine on post-equilibration motility was evaluated.
Spermatozoa motility was evaluated by video microscopy with integrated computer-assisted sperm analysis software.
Clamping (30 min) of the colonic marginal vessels was followed by reperfusion, and the propulsive colonic motility was evaluated.
Sperm motility was evaluated after thawing and at 1-h intervals during 7 h of incubation at 38 °C by subjective examination and by using a CASA-system.
More suggestions(15)
motility were analyzed
motility were recognized
motility were administered
motility were smoothed
motility was evaluated
motility were obtained
motility were detected
motility were upregulated
motility were overexpressed
motility were ranked
motility were regarded
motility were localized
motility were used
motility were recorded
motility were observed
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com