Ai Feedback
Exact(8)
Only in the SF network motifs of type 4 can be found multiply.
It is worth mentioning that it has only slightly lower values and, hence, has a similar good inferability as motifs of type 3. Motifs of type 2 rank third, however, there is already a significant gap to motifs of type 1 and 3. Motifs of type 4 cause the biggest difficulties which can be seen from their low values.
There are some indications that these physical constraints are reflected in the genome sequence in the form of fuzzy motifs (named 'flexible motifs of type A') that constrain a considerable amount of the DNA sequence (Larsabal & Danchin, 2005).
From Table 2 we observe that C3NET consistently infers motifs of type 3 better than the remaining motifs, for all network types, with respect to the mean true reconstruction rate.
For instance, the typical 3D motifs of type 0 bit-patterns resemble the native conformation of GSGS (See Figure 2(a)); whereas those of type 6 identify with α-helices.
Due to the fact that motifs of type 3 can be formed by two leaf edges, in contrast to all other motif types, it is plausible that this motif type can be inferred best.
Similar(52)
Our reports add value to this point, since there is a formation of a noncyclic motif of type V and VI in (4a, 5a, 7a-9a, 8b-13b) (Scheme 2c, d).
As aforementioned, X is a hydrophilic residue in the CXC motif of Type 1 nsLTPs.
The results for the motifs in Table 2 are also supportive for this finding regarding the inferability of leaf edges, because a motif of type 3 can be formed by two leaf edges.
Here, we characterize a novel XA21-binding protein that carries motifs typical of type III J-protein and is involved in cell death and resistance to Xoo.
The P. pryeri EcR-B1 isoform contained the S-rich motif (amino acid residues 75-83; ESSPEVSSS) and the DL-rich motif (amino acid residues 99-112; ELGEVDLDFwhich), wereh were structurally similar to the S-rich motif of the type-4 B1 isoform-specific region and the DL-rich motif of type-3 B1 isoform-specific region, respectively.
Related(17)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com