Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(12)
For each row of the table, the percentage of TF-encoding DEGs associated with a PRE motif was compared with that observed among TF-encoding non-DEGs (Fisher's Exact Test).
The occurrence of the CTCF motif was compared among the promoter sets and not found to be different (Fig. 6b).
For each TF, the single most enriched motif was compared to the TRANSFAC reported motifs for that TF.
The observed frequency of a motif was compared to that found in the randomized NT sequences.
This motif was compared to known motifs in JASPAR Vertebrates [ 31] and UniPROBE Mouse database [ 32] by TOMTOM [ 33] ver 4.9.1.
The shortest distance from the recombination midpoints to the nearest nucleosome-exclusion motif was compared with a distance distribution based on randomly sampled sites.
Similar(48)
e Each motif is compared to every section in the label map to generate a pattern matching scores' map.
The p-values of each motif are compared to all other motifs.
To account for this, SLiM discovery tools attempt to attach a score that indicates how unlikely a given motif is compared to other motifs in a dataset, either through an explicit heuristic [8] or by an empirical estimate [7].
Considering how short the sequence motif is compared to the whole peak region, this is a significant difference, and contributes to explaining the difference in scores between PWM and BBLS PWM methods.
The vectors of 11780 values for each type of motif are compared between different proteomes.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com