Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(1)
But most tools rely on partial data.
Similar(58)
Most tools relied on patient self-report, and included questions on disease knowledge and self-management.
Those most frequently employed tools rely heavily on within and between species genetic variation that has arisen through evolutionary processes (e.g. selection and drift).
Nonetheless, most reaction network generation tools rely on user-defined reaction templates.
Most of the visualization tools rely on the habitual visualization principles.
Quantification of the impacts of epistemic uncertainty is naturally difficult, because most of the existing stochastic tools rely on the specification of the probability distributions and thus do not readily apply to epistemic uncertainty.
5– 8 Most of these preoperative assessment tools rely on existing comorbidities, exercise tolerance, and some lab values to predict postoperative outcomes.
Unfortunately, hitherto most of these tools relied on 18S rDNA and 28S rDNA sequences, which often lack sufficient resolution at the species level.
Few of the most frequently used plant miRNA target prediction tools relied strongly upon exact pattern search and local alignments.
Since most fungal infections occur in immunocompromised patients, the generation of tools relying on host immunity for effectiveness is a notable challenge.
As alternatives to analytical tools relying on sequence similarity, there are tools based on genome context.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com