To the best of our knowledge, most studies on performance analysis of IEEE 802.11 MAC protocols use the results presented in [4] for their theories or discussions [8 13].
In most studies, the performances were measured in terms of an ordinal Likert scale, but they were treated as continuous variables.
Unfortunately, due to limitations in specimen availability, most studies of marker performance (including this one) have evaluated performance in clinical samples collected from women who already have signs and symptoms of cancer.
Most studies evaluating LID performance for mitigating floods focus on the changes of peak flow and runoff volume.
Lepidoptera has seen the most studies of barcode performance to date, and results suggest barcodes permit correct identification in >90% of previously recognized taxa [14] [17].
Although most studies have examined performance in the single preferred hand [17] [19], coordinated bimanual actions form the basis for many everyday motor skills.
Despite variation in the measures collected and in the lengths of follow-up, most studies find that performance tests predict mortality net of self-reported limitations.
Furthermore, most studies on CCTV performance have been carried out in the U.S. in inpatient centers [ 6, 11, 13- 17, 19], whilst in the Netherlands, as well as in many other countries, most MRCs offer outpatient rehabilitation services.
Most studies examining neurobehavioral performance and pesticide exposure have found that pesticide exposure is associated with deficits in cognitive and psychomotor function [see Kamel and Hoppin (2004) for a review].
In addition, due to the use of qualitative descriptions, most studies on header compression performance do not take into account the tradeoff between performance metrics such as robustness and compression efficiency.
