Ai Feedback
Exact(37)
Most studies (n = 20, 87%) had cross-sectional or non-interventional study designs, while 6 (23%) employed quasi-experimental designs.
Students were the target populations in most studies (n = 12).
Most studies (n = 129) included a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Most studies (n = 83) did not report having calibrated their models at all.
Most studies (n = 24) investigated group programmes, of these 23 focussed on parents only.
Most studies (n = 19) did not mention their source of funding.
Similar(23)
Lumbar spine was the skeletal site most studied (n = 15).
Most included studies (n = 135) were based on a single country.
In most unique studies (n = 31), the data were collected by having service members self-report their DS use on questionnaires.
Thus, we may have underestimated DSs in some categories, although most unique studies (n = 24, 72%) did report use of "any" DS.
The small number of samples investigated in most previous studies (n = 1 to 5) [ 17- 20, 22, 23] also raises the possibility that only members of one subtype were present in their study cohorts.
Related(20)
largest studies n
most students n
most trials n
most participants n
most cases n
most mothers n
most indicators n
most patients n
most clinics n
most migrants n
most respondents n
most children n
most tumors n
most units n
most women n
most studies had
most studies assessed
most studies has
most studies been
most studies concentrations
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com