Because the beam is narrow at the focal plane, and due to a finite (extent) depth of field, the illuminated portion of the object can be represented by a K1 × K2 × K3 parallelepiped s ̄ r j, which contains the corresponding most significant reflectivity samples (i.e., the ones shaped by the transmitted pulse, lateral beam function and the depth of field).
The difference is most significant between sample A (primary care, Chiropractic) and the two secondary care samples C (secondary care, multimodal single-center) and D (secondary care, multimodal multi-center).
The most significant difference between samples that can be correlated to the ROS generation and cytotoxicity is the surface chemistry of the samples.
This effect increased markedly at increasing RH, being most significant for the samples stored at 96% RH.
In samples incubated under capacitating conditions (Table IV), compounds #37, #38 and #26 were the most effective in increasing the percentage total motile cells (∼63% of samples) and, as for samples in NCM, the most significant effects were in samples with borderline/low motility.
As for samples in NCM, the most significant effects were in samples with borderline/low motility.
The most significant limitation was sample size, affecting the statistical power of the study results.
Using values from the most significant DMC of pooled samples in the EWAS study, the optimum sample size to reach a 95%% statistical power and a 10−6 significance level, should be from 43 to 100 pooled samples per condition, considering Cohen's d effect sizes of 1.5 to 0.95 respectively.
The most significant differences between the samples were found for roughness and for the descriptors, reliable, natural and solid.
