Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(7)
In addition, the most recent morphological data is consistent with the monophyly of Mandibulata [ 27], but not of Myriochelata.
The most recent morphological or combined morphological and molecular analyses also contradict an origin of Chalcidoidea outside Proctotrupomorpha [ 17, 57].
In summary, classical and most recent morphological and molecular studies based on nuclear data support the Mecopterida and Coleopterida hypotheses.
Most recent morphological analyses suggested a common origin with either the equally enigmatic Rhodopemorpha [ 10], the diaphanid cephalaspidean Toledonia [ 25], or with runcinid or philinoid cephalaspideans [ 22, 33].
Finally, the nesting of Podura within the monophyletic Poduromorpha was strongly supported also by the most recent morphological and molecular (with nuclear genes) analyses [ 69, 72].
Although habitat-specific head shapes are common in D. rosea, the most recent morphological treatments have supported one Holarctic species [ 20, 21].
Similar(53)
Both groupings are in accordance with most recent molecular and morphological hypotheses [28], [29], [44], [46].
Given this uncertainty, a brief discussion of the patterns of congruence and conflict between the present study and the most recent and exhaustive morphological [4] and molecular [29] analyses of higher-level waterbird phylogeny is warranted, as well as a consideration of several potential explanations for conflicting topologies.
The most recent large-scale morphological phylogeny was constructed in 1999 [ 34].
Interestingly, some of the earliest (e.g., [3]), and most recent (e.g., [4]), morphological phylogenetic analyses of the Pelecaniformes have supported ordinal monophyly, while several other recent studies have suggested that the group is paraphyletic or polyphyletic [22], [23], [25], [26], [30].
The two most recent and most comprehensive morphological phylogenetic analyses of eumalacostracan phylogeny are Richter & Scholtz (2001) [ 4] and Poore (2005) [ 3].
More suggestions(15)
most extensive morphological
most apparent morphological
most complex morphological
most distinctive morphological
most common morphological
most representative morphological
most prominent morphological
most drastic morphological
most characteristic morphological
most frequent morphological
most important morphological
most rapid morphological
most distinct morphological
most identifiable morphological
most striking morphological
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com