Sentence examples for most randomized studies from inspiring English sources

Most randomized studies evaluating heparin anticoagulation for CRRT are too small for a robust evaluation of clinical outcome [ 13].

Regarding a potential impact upon survival, most randomized studies comparing RCA with heparin anticoagulation are too small to demonstrate a difference in clinical outcome [ 13].

Most randomized studies in metastatic CRC do not even report whether or not a resection of the primary tumour has been performed [ 10].

10– 12 The possible influence of a palliative resection of the primary tumor on survival has never been properly assessed, and most randomized studies in mCRC do not even report whether a resection of the primary tumor has been performed.

Compared with MVAC, Grade 3/4 neutropenia, at a rate of approximately 37%, was lower in our study compared with the reported 67 82% in the most randomized studies [ 4, 5, 32].

Most randomized studies with bevacizumab that have studied VEGF in serum or tumour tissue have not found a correlation between VEGF expression or plasma levels and treatment; these included one study each in RCC, metastatic breast cancer, pancreatic cancer and mCRC (Jubb et al, 2006; Longo and Gasparini, 2007; Longo and Gasparini, 2008).

Furthermore, like in most randomized controlled studies applying life style intervention, the control group is not a true control group since they also received general information about a healthy lifestyle.

Indeed, most small randomized studies have not demonstrated benefit.

However, most prospective randomized studies [83 87] have shown a significant reduction in hemorrhagic complications in the citrate group, despite the low risk of hemorrhage of the study populations.

Nevertheless, this type of surgery reflects the surgery performed in most randomized trials studying adjuvant treatment in early stage ovarian cancer [ 17], while suboptimal surgical staging is a well recognized problem in early ovarian cancer [ 24, 25].

Most randomized-controlled studies included in this review have adequate randomization and blinding of participants and personnel.