Suggestions(1)
Exact(1)
Immobilised Pt particles (most probably, small uniform aggregates) with dc of about 4.5 nm and a spread of size distribution ca. 1.5 nm demonstrated pronounced adsorption of hydrogen and oxygen similar to pure Pt materials, high electrocatalytic activity with respect to formic acid oxidation as well as a relatively high tolerance towards CO poisoning.
Similar(59)
Since TatB has a protomer molecular weight of 18.4 kDa, and BN-PAGE tends to overestimate native molecular weights [33], the TatB species observed here is not more than a homotetramer and most probably smaller.
Most probably the small range between nearly 0 and +5 °C gave no room for changes in swimming speed.
So, we cannot infer from our meta-analysis that Ki-67 is an independent factor; the answer to that question should come from a prospective study (it is likely that a meta-analysis of individual data would not solve the question as the intersection of the sets of covariates available in the individual studies is most probably very small).
The relative differences would most probably be smaller if lower discount rate was used.
This is owing to the fact that the effective population size of the human population is most probably much smaller than that of mice.
Most probably at such small undercooling, only the most active heterogeneities were able to nucleate PP crystallization.
These differences were not statistically significant, most probably due to small sample size and wide inter-individual variations in bacterial populations.
There were no significant changes over time in any Indigenous drowning rates, most probably due to small numbers and the unusual peak that occurred in 2004.
This most probably reflects the small absolute magnitude of the difference between the DAS28 in the two groups, and confirms that dichotomous outcomes (responder indices) are less sensitive than continuous outcomes.
This potential use is encouraged by the fact that the TNK2 EGFR interaction is most probably amenable to small peptide interference, as has been previously demonstrated for the Cdc42 TNK2 interaction [ 30, 31].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com