Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
Although the AVS of Au particles fabricated at 70°C is larger, the most probable sizes of Au NPs produced at both temperatures are nearly the same.
Similar(59)
(b) Size distribution of 3C-SiC nanocrystals with the most probable size of 4.4 nm obtained by Gaussian fitting.
The most probable size of nano-objects was determined as the position of the major maximum in the distribution histogram.
As one can see, the majority of the NP dimensions are below 5 nm, with the most probable size value being around 2.5 nm.
It is seen that at small u, the distribution φ(R) has non-symmetrical form with respect to the most probable size R mp.
The size distribution of the nanoparticles is in the range 60 150 nm, with the most probable size around 80 nm; the FWHM of the plasmon absorption of silver colloids is 90 nm.
We have shown that with an increase in the anisotropic strength, both the mean size and the most probable size of adsorbate islands on a half-height of the growing surface decrease.
With an increase in the anisotropy strength, the stationary distribution φ(R) transforms back to unimodal Lifshitz-Slyozov-Wagner distribution and the most probable size R mp decreases (see plot at u=5).
The UV-Vis absorbance spectroscopies show that the most probable size of Au NPs produced at different temperature is nearly the same since both of the absorption peaks are around 530 nm.
It was found that the most probable size of the agglomerates is determined by the balance of growth and breakage of the agglomerates, the cross point of the lines of growth rate and breakage rate as a function the particle numbers in an agglomerate marks the most stable agglomerate size.
The blue shift of the UV-Vis absorption peak for the Au NPs produced at 15 mA indicates that the most probable size of nanoparticles fabricated at higher values of current is smaller.TEM images and PSD of the Au NPs produced at a current of 8 mA and 15 mA are given in Figure 3b,b' and c,c', respectively.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com