Furthermore, the most probable potential energy of methane and chlorite gradually increased, that is, the most probable potential energy changed from −4.393 to −3.138 kJ/mol when the temperature increased from 313 to 373 K.
Additionally, the most probable potential energy of methane and chlorite gradually decreased, that is, the most probable potential energy changed from −0.209 to −6.485 kJ/mol as the pressure increased from 2 to 36 MPa.
Examination of Fig. 6b shows that the potential energy distribution curves of methane and chlorite gradually moved to the right with the increase in pore size and the most probable potential energy of methane and chlorite gradually increased, that is, the most probable potential energy changed from −11.92 to −3.56 kJ/mol when the pore size increased from 1 nm to 20 nm.
At the same time, the potential energy distribution curve of methane and chlorite gradually moved to the right and the most probable potential energy of methane and chlorite gradually increased with increasing nitrogen mole fraction.
The most probable proton energy corresponding to the measured 5 GeV muon flux is within 23 30 GeV.
The method involves calculating the most probable (lowest energy) switching path and projecting the motion onto that path.
It can be seen that the most probable potential energy of methane and chlorite for different carbon dioxide mole fractions was higher than that of carbon dioxide, suggesting that the potential energy distribution between methane and chlorite was different from that between carbon dioxide and chlorite.
The most probable potential energy of methane and chlorite did not change significantly with the increase in the water contents, indicating that the methane molecules in the higher-energy adsorption sites could not be occupied with the change of water contents.
