Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
Most private forest owners hold very small properties.
Similar(59)
Most private forests belong to wealthy families who want safe places to store their capital, alternative sources of income as interest rates remain low and who (especially since the financial crisis) prize assets they can touch and sniff over paper promises.In this section Under the bonnet Eyes to the right What will become of them?
Most new private forest owners are small land owners with limited resources available to manage their forest and trade the wood produced.
Some interview informants believed that most private owners managed their forests enough (i.e., thinned and harvested) that little fuel was left to be of consequence.
Absence of insurance is likely to have the greatest effect on landowners or investors who cannot take advantage of geographic diversification and who are most likely to be non-industrial private forest (NIPF) owners.
It appeared from the study that the NIPFs considered the private forest owners' associations as the most relevant organizations to disseminate information on forest-based bioenergy certification.
The majority of the NIPFs considered the regional private forest owners' associations as the most suitable organizations for such dissemination activity.
Given the strong time-preference for the present amongst most private individuals,2 the future benefits of sustainable forest management have little weight in today's commercial decisions.
In terms of the method for disseminating information, half of the NIPFs opined that the personal information letters delivered by the regional private forest owners' associations would be the most suitable method for disseminating information on forest-based bioenergy certification (Figure 4).
Private forest owners' associations and personal information letters emerged as the most favored means to disseminate information on forest-based bioenergy certification to the Finnish NIPFs.
A small pond abutted a private forest.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com